Event Details
June 28, 2004
Description
United States v. Bodmer ruling
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bodmer | person | 34 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00002192.jpg
This document is page 31 of a court filing (Document 100) from December 18, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text argues against the defendant's release by distinguishing her case from precedents where bail was granted (Khashoggi, Bodmer) and aligning it with cases where detention was upheld due to flight risk and foreign ties (Boustani, Patrick Ho, and a 2001 case United States v. Epstein). The 'United States v. Epstein' cited here refers to a 2001 case from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania involving a defendant with German/Brazilian dual citizenship, used here as legal precedent for denying bail based on lack of extradition treaties.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Discussion of the legal case 'U.S. v. Bodmer'
Date unknown
The case of United States v. Bodmer, where the defendant was released to home confinement with GPS monitoring despite the government's argument based on speculation.
2004-01-28 • S.D.N.Y.
In United States v. Bodmer, the court set conditions of bail for a defendant who had consented to extradition.
2004-06-28 • S.D.N.Y.
United States v. Bodmer, where bail was set for a defendant who had consented to extradition, with the court finding the government's argument about financial resources was speculative.
2004-06-28 • S.D.N.Y.
Decision in the case of United States v. Bodmer.
2004-01-28 • S.D.N.Y.
United States v. Bodmer, No. 03 Cr. 947 (SAS), 2004 WL 169790 (S.D.N.Y. June 28, 2004)
2004-06-28 • Southern District of New York
United States v. Bodmer decision
2004-06-28 • S.D.N.Y.
Bodmer case proceedings
2004-01-01 • United States Court
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event