Event Details
January 01, 2020
Description
A covert CIA officer testified under a pseudonym in the case of United States v. Schulte.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CIA Officer | person | 0 | View Entity |
| Schulte | person | 34 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00008390.jpg
This legal document, page 4 of a court filing dated December 15, 2021, details the Court's rejection of the Defense's request to allow a witness to testify under a pseudonym. The Court finds the request untimely, notes that other legal tools like a letter rogatory were available to compel testimony, and distinguishes the case from precedents involving undercover officers whose safety or operational effectiveness would be compromised by revealing their identity.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Filing of Document 185-1 in Case 1:17-cr-00548-PAC.
2021-03-24 • Court (Southern District of NY implied via White Plains)
Indictment of Schulte
Date unknown • White Plains
The defendant in United States v. Schulte filed a motion to dismiss the indictment.
2020-11-16 • United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Judge Crotty rejected the claims and denied the defendant's motion to dismiss in the United States v. Schulte case.
2021-03-26 • United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Schulte was arrested on suspicion of leaking national defense information.
2017-01-01
An indictment charged Schulte with thirteen counts of espionage and other offenses.
2018-06-18
The Government obtained a superseding indictment against Schulte, adding two additional counts of unlawful disclosure and criminal contempt of court.
2018-10-31
Schulte's trial began on eleven national security related charges.
2020-02-02
A jury returned a guilty verdict on two counts (making false statements and criminal contempt of court) but could not reach a unanimous verdict on the remaining eight national security charges.
2020-03-09
The Court granted the Defendant’s motion for a mistrial on the eight charges where the jury could not reach a unanimous verdict.
2020-03-09
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event