Event Details
February 02, 2020
Description
Schulte's trial began on eleven national security related charges.
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schulte | person | 34 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00002823.jpg
This legal document details the procedural history of the criminal case against Schulte, a former CIA employee. It covers his August 2017 arrest for leaking national defense information, subsequent indictments, and a trial in early 2020 which resulted in a guilty verdict on two counts and a mistrial on eight others. The document concludes by noting that the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City immediately after the trial caused a suspension of court proceedings.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Filing of Document 185-1 in Case 1:17-cr-00548-PAC.
2021-03-24 • Court (Southern District of NY implied via White Plains)
Indictment of Schulte
Date unknown • White Plains
The defendant in United States v. Schulte filed a motion to dismiss the indictment.
2020-11-16 • United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Judge Crotty rejected the claims and denied the defendant's motion to dismiss in the United States v. Schulte case.
2021-03-26 • United States District Court, Southern District of New York
A covert CIA officer testified under a pseudonym in the case of United States v. Schulte.
2020-01-01 • S.D.N.Y.
Schulte was arrested on suspicion of leaking national defense information.
2017-01-01
An indictment charged Schulte with thirteen counts of espionage and other offenses.
2018-06-18
The Government obtained a superseding indictment against Schulte, adding two additional counts of unlawful disclosure and criminal contempt of court.
2018-10-31
A jury returned a guilty verdict on two counts (making false statements and criminal contempt of court) but could not reach a unanimous verdict on the remaining eight national security charges.
2020-03-09
The Court granted the Defendant’s motion for a mistrial on the eight charges where the jury could not reach a unanimous verdict.
2020-03-09
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event