Event Details

January 01, 1964

Description

Supreme Court decision in New York Times v. Sullivan

Participants (2)

Name Type Mentions
Supreme Court location 22 View Entity
Justice Goldberg person 22 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017236.jpg

Book Manuscript / Draft Chapter • 2.55 MB
View

This page appears to be a draft of a book chapter (Chapter 10) dated April 2, 2012, discussing legal theories of defamation and the First Amendment. The author, writing in the first person, identifies themselves as a former law clerk for Supreme Court Justice Goldberg during the 1964 *New York Times v. Sullivan* decision. The text analyzes the evolution of defamation laws regarding race, sexual preference, and public figures, noting Goldberg's concerns about the 'actual malice' standard.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

Supreme Court case Blackledge v. Perry, addressing prosecutorial vindictiveness.

1974-01-01 • U.S.

View

Supreme Court case Williams v. Pennsylvania, addressing judicial bias.

2016-01-01 • Pennsylvania

View

The Supreme Court rejects Section 3 of DOMA in the case United States v. Windsor.

0013-08-28 • United States

View

Supreme Court holds that muni bonds are still tax-free in Kentucky v. Davis.

0008-05-30

View

Supreme Court affirms that trust investment advisory fees are subject to a 2% floor (Knight case).

0008-01-28

View

Issuance of a Supreme Court opinion (likely NYT v Sullivan) regarding the Sedition Act.

1964-01-01 • Supreme Court

View

Supreme Court's Windsor decision regarding DOMA

2013-06-01 • Washington D.C.

View

Supreme Court decision in Flemming v. Nestor

1960-01-01 • USA

View

Roe v. Wade

Date unknown • US Supreme Court

View

Bush v. Gore

2000-01-01 • US Supreme Court

View

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
Washington D.C. (implied)
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
2
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 20:00

Additional Data

Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017236.jpg
Date String
1964

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event