November 10, 2025
A court hearing where the importance of voir dire was emphasized and the Court expressed confidence in its ability to identify untruthful jurors.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| court | location | 177 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00009051.jpg
This legal document, part of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, argues that Juror No. 50 provided false answers during jury selection and has subsequently embraced media attention. It contends that the juror's dishonesty prevented proper examination by the court and parties. The document also accuses the government of attempting to silence the juror by writing a letter for media publication, thereby circumventing court orders.
Events with shared participants
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
The Court is evaluating the Defendant's flight risk and proposed conditions for release, such as renouncing citizenship and financial oversight.
Date unknown
Date the second sharing order was signed according to email recollection.
2020-02-04 • New York
Evaluation of Maxwell's appeal of a Protective Order.
Date unknown
Voir dire process where Juror 50 stated he had no doubt about his ability to be fair and impartial.
Date unknown
Jury deliberations during which the jury sent a note inquiring about the proper basis to convict under Count Four.
Date unknown
The document is an argument concerning the sentencing of Ms. Maxwell, specifically regarding the application of guideline § 4B1.5.
Date unknown
Initial Pretrial Conference set to occur.
2019-12-06 • Court
The document discusses arguments and evidence to be presented at an upcoming trial, including the Government's intention to argue certain individuals are co-conspirators.
Date unknown
Defendant points the Court to civil law regarding plaintiffs proceeding by pseudonyms
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event