DOJ-OGR-00009051.jpg
607 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
607 KB
Summary
This legal document, part of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, argues that Juror No. 50 provided false answers during jury selection and has subsequently embraced media attention. It contends that the juror's dishonesty prevented proper examination by the court and parties. The document also accuses the government of attempting to silence the juror by writing a letter for media publication, thereby circumventing court orders.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Juror No. 50 | Juror |
Accused of giving false answers to questions 25 and 48 during jury selection. The document states he has spoken to me...
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Court | Government agency |
Mentioned as the body that would have explored the juror's answers, held an October 21 hearing, and whose orders rega...
|
| government | Government agency |
Mentioned as the author of a letter intended for media publication to silence Juror No. 50.
|
Relationships (2)
The document alleges that Juror No. 50 provided false answers to the Court during the jury selection process.
The document states the government wrote a letter intended to 'effectively silence Juror No. 50'.
Key Quotes (1)
"smoke out” jurors who did not tell the truth"Source
— Court
(A statement made during the October 21 hearing, expressing confidence in the voir dire process.)
DOJ-OGR-00009051.jpg
Quote #1
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,473 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 613 Filed 02/24/22 Page 50 of 66
Fifth, Juror No. 50's false answer to question 48 was not a one-off mistake. He also falsely answered question 25. [REDACTED]
Finally, this case is not like other cases in which a juror may have given a false answer to avoid embarrassment,. Juror No. 50 has spoken to numerous media outlets about his service as a juror, has freely admitted that he is the victim of sexual abuse and sexual assault, and has done the bare minimum to conceal his identity, allowing himself to be identified by his first name while posing for pictures and being video recorded.
Juror No. 50 has not shunned the limelight. He has reveled in it.
Juror No. 50 has not shunned the limelight. He has reveled in it.
D. Had Juror No. 50 answered Questions 25 and 48 truthfully, the parties and the Court would have explored whether his other answers were false.
Regardless of whether Juror No. 50's answers were intentional lies or inadvertent misstatements, his false answers to Questions 25 and 48 [REDACTED].
At the October 21 hearing, this Court emphasized the importance of voir dire, and it expressed confidence that it could “smoke out” jurors who did not tell the truth:
[REDACTED]
letter was written by the government with full knowledge that it would be published by the media and effectively silence Juror No. 50. The submission of the letter was an end run around this Court’s orders regarding Local Rule 23.1 and Rule 3.6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct.
43
DOJ-OGR-00009051
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document