Event Details

August 10, 2022

Description

Court filing of transcript for Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.

Participants (5)

Name Type Mentions
The Court organization 2003 View Entity
Loftus person 198 View Entity
MS. MENNINGER person 1436 View Entity
court location 177 View Entity
MR. PAGLIUCA person 1022 View Entity

Source Documents (3)

DOJ-OGR-00016618.jpg

Court Transcript • 632 KB
View

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of expert witness Dr. Elizabeth Loftus. Loftus testifies about the fallibility of memory, specifically explaining 'rich false memories' and how scientific studies have successfully planted entire false events into people's minds, such as being attacked by an animal or nearly drowning.

DOJ-OGR-00011720.jpg

Court Transcript / Legal Proceeding • 563 KB
View

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) where attorney Mr. Pagliuca discusses the admissibility of evidence regarding communications between witnesses' lawyers and the government. Specifically, Pagliuca mentions an email from attorney Mr. Scarola to the government suggesting ten topics for an interview with a woman named Carolyn. The discussion centers on whether these communications (proffers and emails) are privileged and how they will be introduced without calling the lawyers as witnesses.

DOJ-OGR-00017159.jpg

Court Transcript (Summation) • 648 KB
View

This document is a page from the defense summation (closing argument) by Ms. Menninger in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (referenced as the 'Oxford-educated, proper English woman'), filed on August 10, 2022. Menninger attempts to discredit the prosecution's 'culture of silence' theory by noting that household manager Juan Alessi threw away the 'mysterious household manual' and that no other staff testified to using it. The defense also argues that pilot Larry Visoski's nondisclosure agreement was standard practice for wealthy individuals to protect the privacy of famous passengers like Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, and John Glenn, rather than to conceal illicit sexual activity.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.

2022-08-10

View

A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.

2022-08-10 • courthouse

View

A deposition was conducted, as evidenced by the transcript.

Date unknown • Not specified

View

The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.

Date unknown

View

Deposition of an unnamed witness conducted by Mr. Edwards, with Mr. Pagliuca present as counsel. The topic is photographs taken by an unnamed male.

Date unknown • Not mentioned

View

The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.

Date unknown

View

The Government gave on-the-record assurances to the Court regarding investigative files.

2020-07-14

View

A discussion between attorneys and the court regarding how to respond to a jury note.

2022-08-10 • Courtroom

View

Court proceeding regarding witness strategy in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).

2022-08-10 • Courtroom

View

Jury Deliberation/Instruction

Date unknown • Courtroom

View

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
Southern District of New York
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
5
Source Documents
3
Extracted
2025-11-20 22:46

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00011720.jpg
Date String
2022-08-10

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event