Event Details
January 01, 2003
Description
An amendment to Section 3283 was passed, which Maxwell claims was impermissibly applied to her case.
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MAXWELL | person | 1792 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00021691.jpg
This page from a legal document outlines the legal standard for retroactivity as established in the Supreme Court case Landgraf v. USI Film Products. It then introduces an argument from a claimant named Maxwell, who alleges that the District Court incorrectly applied a 2003 amendment to Section 3283 retroactively to her convictions on Counts Three, Four, and Six, which involved conduct predating the amendment.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Maxwell taught Jane how to massage Epstein, which led to the abuse.
Date unknown
The appeal by Defendant-Appellant Maxwell was dismissed, and the motion to consolidate was denied as moot.
2020-10-19
Carolyn testifies that Maxwell, two of Mr. Epstein's friends, and two other girls saw her fully naked in a massage room.
Date unknown • massage room at Jeffrey Epstein's house
Early phase of the conspiracy where Maxwell and Epstein identified, isolated, groomed, and sexually abused vulnerable girls.
1994-01-01
Later phase of the scheme where Maxwell and Epstein developed a stream of girls who recruited each other to visit Epstein's Palm Beach residence, where they were paid.
2001-01-01 • Palm Beach residence
Carolyn testifies that Maxwell touched her breasts on one of the occasions she was seen naked in the massage room.
Date unknown • massage room at Jeffrey Epstein's house
Filing of Document 82 in Case 20-3061
2020-10-02 • Court
Judge Nathan issued an Order denying Maxwell's motion to modify a Protective Order
2020-10-02 • District Court
Maxwell continued to call Carolyn to schedule massage appointments with Jeffrey Epstein.
Date unknown
Maxwell called for Mr Epstein.
2004-07-09
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event