Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
A discovery request made by Juror No. 50, which this document argues the Court should refuse.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Juror No. 50 | person | 232 | View Entity |
| This Court | organization | 84 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009751.jpg
This legal document, filed on March 11, 2022, argues that a court should deny a discovery request from 'Juror No. 50'. The filing asserts that the juror has no legal standing to intervene in the criminal case, citing legal precedent. Furthermore, it reveals that Juror No. 50 is under investigation, and releasing the requested information would prejudice that investigation by allowing the juror to tailor responses and alter the investigation's focus.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The process where potential jurors, including Juror No. 50, were questioned. The document discusses how Juror No. 50 answered Question 48 during this time.
Date unknown • Courtroom (implied)
Juror No. 50 publicly discussed his beliefs about the science of memory, stating that his own memory is like a video-tape.
Date unknown • Media
Maxwell's 'renewed motion' being deemed substantively meritless by 'This Court'.
Date unknown
A jury returned its verdict in a case, less than one week before January 4, 2022.
2022-01-04
Lucia Osborne-Crowley interviewed Juror No. 50 for an article.
2022-01-04
The Independent published an article based on the interview with Juror No. 50.
2022-01-04
Juror No. 50 was a victim of sexual assault and abuse.
Date unknown
Juror No. 50 revealed his experience with abuse to the jury, which was fundamental to the verdict.
Date unknown • jury room
The jury selection process during which Juror No. 50 allegedly provided false answers.
Date unknown • Court
Juror No. 50 sat for an interview as part of an hour-long documentary called “Ghislaine, Prince Andrew and the Paedophile.”
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event