Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
The writing of a legal brief by Edelstein and Ms. Brune.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Edelstein | person | 115 | View Entity |
| Ms. Brune | person | 82 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00010090.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal proceeding where a witness named Edelstein is being questioned about the drafting of a legal brief. Edelstein testifies about a discussion with a colleague, Ms. Brune, regarding whether to disclose their prior knowledge of a suspended lawyer named Catherine Conrad. The testimony centers on their intent and state of mind at the time, stating they were not focused on the legal concept of 'waiver' but rather on establishing facts.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
A witness named Edelstein is questioned about a decision made with Susan Brune to omit information from a legal brief.
Date unknown
Edelstein and Susan Brune decided to omit information about a juror note and a suspended lawyer from a legal brief they were preparing.
Date unknown
Direct examination of Ms. Brune regarding her knowledge and actions during the voir dire process.
Date unknown • Court (implied)
Voir dire, the process of jury selection, is discussed.
Date unknown • Court (implied)
Redirect examination of Ms. Brune by Mr. Davis, during which Government Exhibit 28 (a letter from Ms. Brune) is admitted into evidence.
Date unknown • The Court
A discussion between Edelstein and Ms. Brune about what information to include or omit in a legal brief concerning Catherine Conrad.
Date unknown
A witness, Edelstein, is questioned by an attorney about their knowledge of Catherine Conrad's professional status.
Date unknown
A discussion about whether computer research on Ms. Conrad could have been performed on May 12th.
0012-05-01
Theresa Trzaskoma told the witness (Edelstein) that there was a suspended lawyer named Catherine Conrad.
Date unknown
A question-and-answer session where a witness named Edelstein is being questioned about the intent and content of a legal brief.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event