Event Details
July 14, 2020
Description
A bail hearing where the Court determined the Defendant was a flight risk due to international ties and financial resources.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| defendant | person | 747 | View Entity |
| court | location | 177 | View Entity |
Source Documents (2)
DOJ-OGR-00002242.jpg
This legal document is a court filing from December 30, 2020, outlining the court's decision to support the detention of the Defendant. The court finds the government's case strong, citing witness testimony and evidence like flight records that link the Defendant to Epstein's conduct, and determines the Defendant is a flight risk due to her substantial international ties, multiple foreign citizenships, and extraordinary financial resources.
DOJ-OGR-00002242(1).jpg
This legal document, filed on December 30, 2020, outlines a court's reasoning for denying bail to a defendant. The court finds the government's case, supported by witness testimony and evidence linking the defendant to Epstein, to be strong, creating a flight risk. This risk is further substantiated by the defendant's substantial international ties, foreign property, and significant financial resources, leading the court to conclude that detention is warranted.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
The Government opposed the Defendant’s motion for release on bail.
2021-03-09
A legal proceeding where a defendant is tried, involving a jury, judge, and government prosecution.
Date unknown
Stages of a legal trial where a defendant's innocence is presumed and the government must prove guilt.
Date unknown
The Court is evaluating the Defendant's flight risk and proposed conditions for release, such as renouncing citizenship and financial oversight.
Date unknown
A court document (Document 36) was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, outlining the rules for handling discovery materials.
2020-07-30
Date the second sharing order was signed according to email recollection.
2020-02-04 • New York
Evaluation of Maxwell's appeal of a Protective Order.
Date unknown
Discussion of a legal motion regarding the rules for cross-examination at an upcoming trial, specifically concerning the public disclosure of the names of Minor Victims.
Date unknown • Court
Voir dire process where Juror 50 stated he had no doubt about his ability to be fair and impartial.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event