DOJ-OGR-00002242.jpg

720 KB

Extraction Summary

2
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 720 KB
Summary

This legal document is a court filing from December 30, 2020, outlining the court's decision to support the detention of the Defendant. The court finds the government's case strong, citing witness testimony and evidence like flight records that link the Defendant to Epstein's conduct, and determines the Defendant is a flight risk due to her substantial international ties, multiple foreign citizenships, and extraordinary financial resources.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Defendant Defendant
The subject of the legal document, accused of enticing minors and determined by the court to be a flight risk.
Epstein
Mentioned in relation to a conspiracy charge and conduct to which the Defendant is linked by evidence.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Government government agency
The prosecuting party in the case, which has proffered evidence against the Defendant.
Court judicial body
The judicial body presiding over the case, which made determinations about the Defendant's bail and flight risk.

Timeline (1 events)

2020-07-14
A bail hearing where the Court determined the Defendant was a flight risk due to international ties and financial resources.

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned in reference to the Defendant's familial and personal connections.

Relationships (1)

Defendant co-conspirator Epstein
The document mentions a "conspiracy charge" and "evidence linking the Defendant to Epstein's conduct."

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,133 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 106 Filed 12/30/20 Page 10 of 22
weight of the evidence is weak. Def. Reply at 2. But she too easily discredits the witness testimony. According to the Government, and as reflected in the indictment, it is anticipated that the three witnesses will provide detailed and corroborating accounts of the Defendant’s alleged role in enticing minors to engage in sex acts. See Gov’t Opp’n at 10; see also Dkt. No. 17, S1 Superseding Indictment, ¶¶ 7, 11, 13, 17. Moreover, the Government proffers that additional evidence, including flight records and other witnesses’ corroborating testimony, will further support the main witnesses’ testimony and link the Defendant to Epstein’s conduct. Gov’t Opp’n at 10–11. And while the Defendant contends that much of this evidence focuses on Epstein, not the Defendant, the nature of the conspiracy charge (along with the evidence linking the Defendant to Epstein) renders this evidence relevant to the Government’s charges against her. As the Court stated in the July 14, 2020 hearing, although the Court does not prejudge the merits of the Government’s case or of the Defendant’s defenses, for purposes of the bail determination stage, the Government’s proffered case against the Defendant remains strong. See Dkt. No. 93 (“Tr.”) at 83:4–83:10. The Court again concludes that the Defendant’s awareness of the potential strength of the government’s case against her creates a risk of flight, and none of the Defendant’s new arguments meaningfully alter that conclusion. As a result, the second factor supports detention.
2. The Defendant’s History and Characteristics
At the July 14, 2020 bail hearing, the Court determined that the Defendant was a flight risk in part because of her substantial international ties, including multiple foreign citizenships and familial and personal connections abroad and her ownership of at least one foreign property of significant value. See Tr. at 83:13–83:18. And the Court further noted that the Defendant’s extraordinary financial resources could provide her the means to flee the country even despite
10
DOJ-OGR-00002242

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document