July 26, 2017
Legal Deposition
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| THE WITNESS (Deponent) | person | 0 | View Entity |
| Mr. Simpson | person | 97 | View Entity |
| MR. TEIN | person | 444 | View Entity |
| MR. SCAROLA | person | 157 | View Entity |
| Mr. Goldberger | person | 56 | View Entity |
| MS. McCAWLEY | person | 68 | View Entity |
| the witness | person | 200 | View Entity |
| Mr. Leopold | person | 126 | View Entity |
| Interrogating Attorney | person | 0 | View Entity |
| witness | person | 107 | View Entity |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021856.jpg
This document page is a rough draft of a deposition transcript. A witness is questioned by Mr. Simpson about whether anyone had told them that Professor Dershowitz abused minors. Ms. McCawley objects based on attorney/client privilege regarding Virginia Roberts, and Mr. Scarola instructs the witness not to answer, to which the witness agrees.
DOJ-OGR-00033014.jpg
This document is page 26 of a deposition transcript involving a heated exchange between attorneys Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold. The witness is questioned about whether anyone persuaded them to engage in sexual activity with Jeffrey Epstein for money before arriving at his house, which the witness denies. The document features a significant procedural argument where Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of 'coaching the witness' during the testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00033077.jpg
This is page 89 of a legal deposition transcript processed by Consor & Associates. The witness is questioned about whether they or their parents spoke to any law firms other than those of Mr. Herman and Mr. Leopold. The witness denies speaking to others but asks if 'family court matters.' Ultimately, the witness identifies Mr. Leopold as the person who prepared them for that day's deposition.
DOJ-OGR-00032999.jpg
This document is a page from a deposition transcript involving attorneys Leopold, Goldberger, and Tein, dated July 26, 2017 (based on the footer stamp). The text captures a contentious exchange where Mr. Leopold defends his objections regarding 'improper foundation,' while Mr. Goldberger and Mr. Tein accuse him of wasting time and obstructing the process. Mr. Tein specifically reprimands Leopold for failing to appear earlier in the morning after a separate hearing was cancelled, allegedly breaking a prior agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00033054.jpg
Page 66 of a deposition transcript involving an unnamed witness, attorney Mr. Tein, and attorney Mr. Leopold. The questioning focuses on the witness's alleged habit of lying about their age, specifically in relation to MySpace and obtaining body piercings. The witness denies lying to get piercings but clarifies they have one body piercing (excluding ears) after initially stating five.
DOJ-OGR-00033075.jpg
This is a page from a deposition transcript (Page 87) involving attorneys Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold. The text captures a contentious exchange between the lawyers regarding objections and procedure. Mr. Tein questions a witness (whose name is redacted) about whether they or their mother have spoken to or received money from reporters; the witness answers 'No' to the questions regarding themselves.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021868.jpg
This document is page 45 of a rough draft deposition transcript bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. Attorney Mr. Simpson asks a witness if, as of December 30, 2014, anyone (other than Virginia Roberts) had told them that Alan Dershowitz abused minors. Attorney Mr. Scarola objects and instructs the witness not to answer, citing attorney-client and work product privileges.
Events with shared participants
A deposition where attorney Mr. Tein questions a witness about a MySpace message (Exhibit 31-001). A recess was taken during the proceedings.
Date unknown • Unspecified deposition location
A legal deposition is taking place where a witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein, with their attorney Mr. Leopold present.
Date unknown • Not specified
A discussion was held 'off the record' during the deposition.
Date unknown • Undetermined
A legal proceeding, likely a deposition, where a direct examination of a witness occurred. The filename '~0929104.TXT' suggests the date.
2004-09-29 • Likely Coconut Grove, FL
Direct examination of a witness by Mr. Tein, indexed to begin on page 4 of the full transcript.
Date unknown
The witness is questioned by Mr. Tein in a legal proceeding.
Date unknown • Not specified (likely a deposition room)
A legal deposition where an unidentified witness is questioned by attorney Mr. Tein.
2010-09-29 • Unknown
The deposition or testimony recorded in this transcript took place.
2010-09-29 • undetermined
A legal deposition where a witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein, with Mr. Leopold also present as an attorney.
2010-09-29 • Undisclosed deposition location
A heated argument occurs during a legal deposition among the attorneys present. The dispute centers on procedural conduct, interruptions, and the nature of objections, specifically attorney-client privilege.
Date unknown • Deposition Room (unspecified)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event