HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021868.jpg
1.29 MB
Extraction Summary
5
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal deposition transcript (rough draft)
File Size:
1.29 MB
Summary
This document is page 45 of a rough draft deposition transcript bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. Attorney Mr. Simpson asks a witness if, as of December 30, 2014, anyone (other than Virginia Roberts) had told them that Alan Dershowitz abused minors. Attorney Mr. Scarola objects and instructs the witness not to answer, citing attorney-client and work product privileges.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Scarola | Attorney |
Defending attorney; instructs the witness not to answer based on attorney/client privilege.
|
| Mr. Simpson | Attorney |
Questioning attorney.
|
| Virginia Roberts | Subject/Witness |
Mentioned as a person being 'put aside' for the specific line of questioning regarding Alan Dershowitz.
|
| Alan Dershowitz | Subject of Inquiry |
Subject of an allegation; the question asks if the witness was told he abused minors.
|
| Witness (Unidentified) | Witness |
The person answering 'Okay' (denoted as 'A.') and being instructed by Mr. Scarola.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021868'.
|
Timeline (1 events)
Relationships (2)
Scarola instructs the witness not to answer based on attorney/client privilege.
The questioning attorney distinguishes between Roberts and other potential accusers of Dershowitz.
Key Quotes (2)
"As of December 30th, 2014, putting aside Miss Roberts... had anyone... told you that Alan Dershowitz had abused any other minors?"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021868.jpg
Quote #1
"MR. SCAROLA: I'm going to instruct you not to answer that question on the basis of the attorney/client and work product privileges."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021868.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,106 characters)
45
1 the clock or anything, but let's get this moving along
2 so we can get your questions answered.
3 Q. I just need to make my record on that.
4 So we are going to put aside Virginia
5 Roberts.
6 A. Okay.
7 Q. And I'm not talking about attorneys here
8 talking about -- what I'm talking about is people who
9 could be witnesses, people who saw things, people did
10 things, heard things, people who have evidence that
11 would be admissible in court. Do you have that in mind?
12 A. Okay.
13 Q. As of December 30th, 2014, putting aside
14 Miss Roberts, as to whom you've refused to answer, had
15 anyone who fits that category of a person with personal
16 knowledge of admissible evidence told you that Alan
17 Dershowitz had abused any other minors?
18 MR. SCAROLA: I'm going to instruct you not
19 to answer that question on the basis of the
20 attorney/client and work product privileges.
21 MR. SIMPSON: The knowledge -- let me ask
22 this way.
23 MR. SCAROLA: Let me explain. It might be
24 helpful to you if I were to explain the basis of
25 my objection.
2 so we can get your questions answered.
3 Q. I just need to make my record on that.
4 So we are going to put aside Virginia
5 Roberts.
6 A. Okay.
7 Q. And I'm not talking about attorneys here
8 talking about -- what I'm talking about is people who
9 could be witnesses, people who saw things, people did
10 things, heard things, people who have evidence that
11 would be admissible in court. Do you have that in mind?
12 A. Okay.
13 Q. As of December 30th, 2014, putting aside
14 Miss Roberts, as to whom you've refused to answer, had
15 anyone who fits that category of a person with personal
16 knowledge of admissible evidence told you that Alan
17 Dershowitz had abused any other minors?
18 MR. SCAROLA: I'm going to instruct you not
19 to answer that question on the basis of the
20 attorney/client and work product privileges.
21 MR. SIMPSON: The knowledge -- let me ask
22 this way.
23 MR. SCAROLA: Let me explain. It might be
24 helpful to you if I were to explain the basis of
25 my objection.
ROUGH DRAFT ONLY
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021868
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document