Event Details
January 01, 1972
Description
The Supreme Court ruled in Giglio v. United States, holding that an AUSA had a duty to disclose a promise of immunity made by another AUSA.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States Supreme Court | organization | 52 | View Entity |
| Giglio | person | 42 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00021839.jpg
This legal document, page 15 of a filing dated November 1, 2024, argues that the legal precedent in 'Annabi' is inconsistent with U.S. Supreme Court rulings. It cites the cases of 'Santobello' (1971) and 'Giglio' (1972) to support the principle that a prosecutor's office functions as a single entity for the government, and therefore, promises made by one prosecutor (such as in plea or immunity agreements) are binding on others, even across different districts.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Legal case: Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150
1972-01-01 • U.S. Supreme Court
Giglio v. U.S., 405 U.S. 150 (1972)
1972-01-01 • U.S. Supreme Court
The Supreme Court ruled in the Santobello case, holding that one prosecutor's promise in a plea agreement binds other prosecutors.
1971-01-01
The Supreme Court ruling in the Santobello case (404 U.S. 257), establishing that a prosecutor's promise in a plea agreement binds other prosecutors in the same office.
1971-01-01
The Supreme Court ruling in Giglio v. United States, which held that an Assistant United Stated Attorney had a duty to disclose a promise of immunity made by another AUSA.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event