Event Details

January 01, 1971

Description

The Supreme Court ruling in the Santobello case (404 U.S. 257), establishing that a prosecutor's promise in a plea agreement binds other prosecutors in the same office.

Participants (2)

Name Type Mentions
Santobello person 17 View Entity
United States Supreme Court organization 52 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00021081.jpg

legal document • 743 KB
View

This legal document excerpt critiques the Second Circuit's interpretation of plea agreements, arguing it misread its own precedent in the 'Papa' case to create an "illogical" rule. This rule is contrasted with United States Supreme Court precedent from cases like 'Santobello' and 'Giglio', which establish that promises made by one prosecutor are binding on other prosecutors within the same office and must be disclosed.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

The Supreme Court ruled in the Santobello case, holding that one prosecutor's promise in a plea agreement binds other prosecutors.

1971-01-01

View

The Supreme Court ruled in Giglio v. United States, holding that an AUSA had a duty to disclose a promise of immunity made by another AUSA.

1972-01-01

View

The Supreme Court ruling in Giglio v. United States, which held that an Assistant United Stated Attorney had a duty to disclose a promise of immunity made by another AUSA.

Date unknown

View

Legal case citation for Santobello v. United States, No. 94 Cr. (RPP), 1998 WL 113950 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 13, 1998).

1998-03-13 • S.D.N.Y.

View

Event Metadata

Type
Legal Ruling
Location
Unknown
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
2
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 15:47

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00021081.jpg
Date String
1971

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event