Event Details
August 10, 2022
Description
A cross-examination during which Ms. Pomerantz argues for the relevance of a witness's experiments on memory, distinguishing them from other evidence, and the Court issues an 'Overruled' ruling.
Participants (4)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MS. POMERANTZ | person | 906 | View Entity |
| the Judge | person | 138 | View Entity |
| witness | person | 107 | View Entity |
| MR. PAGLIUCA | person | 1022 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00016659.jpg
This document is a partial transcript from a legal proceeding filed on August 10, 2022, detailing a segment of a cross-examination. Ms. Pomerantz argues for the relevance of a witness's experiments on memory, distinguishing them from other evidence related to Dr. Rocchio, while Mr. Pagliuca briefly interjects. The Court ultimately rules 'Overruled' on an unspecified objection or motion.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Deposition of an unnamed witness conducted by Mr. Edwards, with Mr. Pagliuca present as counsel. The topic is photographs taken by an unnamed male.
Date unknown • Not mentioned
A discussion between attorneys and the court regarding how to respond to a jury note.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Direct examination of witness 'Kate' in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Witness entered an appearance in a specific case pro hac vice.
Date unknown • Southern District of Florida
Court proceeding regarding Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Legal argument regarding 'omission theory' and inconsistency in testimony.
2022-08-10 • Southern District of New York (implied by court reporters)
The conclusion of a cross-examination of witness Dr. Dubin by Ms. Moe, an objection by Mr. Pagliuca, and the witness being excused by the court.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom (implied)
Cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn regarding a deposition document from October 21, 2009.
Date unknown • Courtroom
Firm partner meetings.
2009-01-01 • RRA Firm
Deposition of Ghislaine Maxwell where she is questioned about electronic records and updates to contact lists.
Date unknown • Unknown
Witness observed a young girl (est. 16-17) coming for massages.
Date unknown • Property
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event