Event Details
January 01, 2009
Description
Firm partner meetings.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unnamed partners | person | 12 | View Entity |
| witness | person | 107 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017510.jpg
This is a deposition transcript (pages 78-81) involving a witness (likely Scott Rothstein, based on the mention of RRA and Ponzi scheme) being questioned by an attorney named Tonja. The witness admits to running a Ponzi scheme, creating fake settlement documents, and luring investors. The questioning shifts to the 'Epstein case,' specifically asking if the witness or his associates (Kip, Brad, Russ) utilized the case for publicity or spoke to the press, to which the witness claims no specific recollection. The witness confirms knowing Epstein was from Palm Beach but denies further knowledge of his residence.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Start of the period relevant to the Investment Period.
Date unknown • Not specified
Witness entered an appearance in a specific case pro hac vice.
Date unknown • Southern District of Florida
Witness observed a young girl (est. 16-17) coming for massages.
Date unknown • Property
A cross-examination during which Ms. Pomerantz argues for the relevance of a witness's experiments on memory, distinguishing them from other evidence, and the Court issues an 'Overruled' ruling.
2022-08-10 • Court
A witness was personally served by a process server and handed contact information.
Date unknown
A deposition where Mr. Tein is questioning a witness who is represented by Mr. Leopold.
2017-07-26 • Unknown
Discussion regarding Dr. Loftus's opinions on suggestive questioning, Agent Young's testimony, a motion to preclude Alexander Hamilton's testimony, and a defense response concerning a witness. The court also references a legal precedent from 'Hamilton in Federal '78'.
2022-08-10
Cross-examination regarding Jeffrey Epstein's wealth and bank accounts at JP Morgan, including discussion of Government Exhibit 504.
2022-08-10
A witness was on the stand for cross-examination and began to clarify details about moving to a second address in Palm Beach as a teenager.
Date unknown • Courtroom
The document provides instructions for a jury regarding witness testimony during 'this trial' (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
Date unknown • Southern District
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event