December 14, 2020
Filing of Document 102 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOVERNMENT | organization | 2805 | View Entity |
| defendant | person | 747 | View Entity |
| Defense | organization | 240 | View Entity |
| GHISLAINE MAXWELL | person | 9575 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00020055.jpg
This document is page 35 of a legal filing (Document 102) dated December 14, 2020, arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The defense asserts she is not a flight risk and argues that her current detention at the MDC constitutes 'de facto solitary confinement' under conditions rivaling a Supermax prison, which impairs her ability to prepare her defense. The text cites United States v. Orta regarding bail standards and claims wardens have noted the unprecedented nature of her restrictive regime.
DOJ-OGR-00020077.jpg
This page from a government filing (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) argues that the defendant is a flight risk. It highlights her time hiding in New Hampshire, her foreign ties to the UK and France, and the difficulty of extradition. A footnote reveals that in 2018, despite being married, both the defendant and her spouse listed their status as 'single' on bank trust account forms, which the government cites as evidence of a lack of candor.
DOJ-OGR-00020081.jpg
This document is page 18 of a government filing (Document 102) from June 18, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The text argues against bail by highlighting flight risks, specifically noting that France does not extradite its own citizens (citing the 'Peterson' case) and arguing that any 'anticipatory waiver' of extradition the defendant might sign regarding the United Kingdom is legally unenforceable under UK law (referencing the Extradition Act of 2003 and U.S. v. Stanton). The prosecution asserts that such waivers are meaningless until a defendant is physically present before a British judge.
Events with shared participants
Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel filed on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell
2021-03-30 • 02nd Circuit Court of Appeals
A shipment discussed in court, sent from Ghislaine Maxwell to Casey Wasserman. The event is stated to have occurred in 'October'.
Date unknown
LETTER REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell.
2020-07-29
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
Filing or processing of the Reply Memorandum in Support of Third Motion for Bail
2021-04-01 • Federal Court (Implied)
Government conducted multiple in-person interviews with Minor Victim-4, concluding near the end of January 2021.
2021-01-31
Government conducted additional investigation to corroborate Minor Victim-4, including interviewing additional witnesses, reviewing documents, and subpoenaing additional records.
2021-03-31
Filing of Document 172-1 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
2021-03-23 • US District Court
Filing of Document 82 in Case 20-3061
2020-10-02 • Court
Arraignment. Defendant entered plea of Not Guilty. Trial set for July 12, 2021.
2020-07-14 • Video Conference / Telephone
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event