This document is page 35 of a legal filing (Document 102) dated December 14, 2020, arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The defense asserts she is not a flight risk and argues that her current detention at the MDC constitutes 'de facto solitary confinement' under conditions rivaling a Supermax prison, which impairs her ability to prepare her defense. The text cites United States v. Orta regarding bail standards and claims wardens have noted the unprecedented nature of her restrictive regime.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the bail application, arguing against flight risk and describing poor prison conditions.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Associate |
Mentioned in reference to the timeline of events ('since Epstein's arrest').
|
| Wardens/Interim Wardens | Prison Officials |
Unnamed officials who reportedly remarked on the severity of Maxwell's confinement regime.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MDC |
Metropolitan Detention Center, where Maxwell is currently held.
|
|
| USP Florence ADMAX |
Supermax prison used as a comparison for the severity of Maxwell's conditions.
|
|
| 8th Circuit Court |
Cited in legal precedent (United States v. Orta).
|
|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Indicated by the footer stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
"Ms. Maxwell has no intention of fleeing."Source
"The alternative to release is her continued confinement under extraordinarily onerous conditions that are not only unjust and punitive, but also meaningfully impair Ms. Maxwell’s ability to review the voluminous discovery produced by the government"Source
"Ms. Maxwell has spent the entirety of her detention now over five months in de facto solitary confinement"Source
"conditions that rival those used at USP Florence ADMAX"Source
"tantamount to imprisonment as a defendant convicted of capital murder and incarcerated on death row."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,157 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document