Event Details
November 07, 2025
Description
A telephone call where a judge was trying to identify people involved in a process.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| the Judge | person | 138 | View Entity |
| Brune | person | 216 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00010046.jpg
This document is a court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Brune. The questioning centers on jury research conducted for jury selection, a specific telephone call on July 22nd with a judge regarding a juror connected to Catherine Conrad, and the witness's failure to identify "Mr. Nardello's firm" during that call. The transcript concludes with the witness confirming their firm resisted a subsequent government discovery request by filing a brief claiming the information was protected as client work product.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The jury is instructed on how to conduct their deliberations in the criminal case against Ms. Maxwell.
2021-12-19
A cross-examination during which Ms. Pomerantz argues for the relevance of a witness's experiments on memory, distinguishing them from other evidence, and the Court issues an 'Overruled' ruling.
2022-08-10 • Court
Ms. Brune is giving testimony under direct examination.
Date unknown • Courtroom
A direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding the legal team and paralegals involved in the 'Parma matter'.
Date unknown • Unspecified
Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding the jury selection process (voir dire).
Date unknown
A past voir dire process is discussed, where the plan was for Judge Pauley to question potential juror Catherine M. Conrad to determine if she was the same person from a court opinion.
Date unknown
A courtroom discussion regarding the offering of evidence. Ms. Comey attempts to offer something into the record, Mr. Pagliuca expresses confusion and then objects, requesting to approach the bench.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
A summation (closing argument) was delivered by Ms. Menninger to a jury regarding the government's burden of proof in the case against Ms. Maxwell.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom (implied)
Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding their legal experience and a specific trial.
Date unknown • Courtroom (implied)
The witness, Brune, confirms having conducted many Grand Jury investigations in a past role as an assistant.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event