August 10, 2022
A discussion in court regarding a potential rebuttal expert, the timing of closing arguments, and the logistical planning for presenting sealed and public exhibits to the jury.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speaker (Government/Prosecution) | person | 0 | View Entity |
| Defense | organization | 240 | View Entity |
| court | location | 177 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00013855.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in which a representative for the government discusses trial logistics with the court. The speaker mentions a potential rebuttal expert, affirms the government's readiness to proceed to closing arguments immediately after the defense rests, and raises the need to coordinate with the defense on the mechanics of presenting sealed and public exhibits to the jury.
Events with shared participants
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
The Court is evaluating the Defendant's flight risk and proposed conditions for release, such as renouncing citizenship and financial oversight.
Date unknown
Tentative trial date set by the court.
2020-06-08 • Courtroom
Date the second sharing order was signed according to email recollection.
2020-02-04 • New York
A trial where the Government plans to use certain statements and evidence, which is the subject of the defense's motion.
Date unknown
Evaluation of Maxwell's appeal of a Protective Order.
Date unknown
The defense submitted a financial report showing the defendant has approximately $22 million in assets.
Date unknown • Court
A rebuttal is given by Ms. Comey in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
Date unknown • Court
Voir dire process where Juror 50 stated he had no doubt about his ability to be fair and impartial.
Date unknown
Government's motion, which the defense is largely ignoring precedent for
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event