July 08, 2011
The lawyers submitted a memorandum regarding a new trial motion.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| lawyers | person | 12 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00009454.jpg
This legal document analyzes statements made by defense lawyers in a memorandum regarding their investigation of a juror named Conrad. The author, likely a judge, concludes that while the lawyers' phrasing could have been clearer and may have led to unintended inferences, their statements were not knowingly false or a violation of ethical rules. The analysis specifically addresses a July 15 telephone conference where a lawyer, Trzaskoma, denied prior awareness of certain facts, a statement the author finds consistent with the lawyers' overall position.
Events with shared participants
Past meetings where lawyers for certain people were present and communicated with the government.
Date unknown • Offices
Ms. Sternheim delivers an opening statement in a legal case against Ms. Maxwell, discussing the government's approach to 'grooming' and the financial incentives for witnesses from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund.
2022-08-10 • court
A legal trial during which these instructions are given to the jury. The document outlines the rules for considering evidence presented during this trial.
Date unknown
A legal trial is in progress, during which these instructions are given to the jury.
Date unknown • courtroom
Voir dire for the trial, during which Juror Conrad's answers were given.
2025-03-01 • Court
A memorandum was written or filed, which is the subject of analysis in this document.
2011-07-08
The underlying legal trial during which Conrad served as a juror.
Date unknown
The jury selection process where Juror Conrad gave answers under oath.
2025-11-03
Lawyers and the FBI repeatedly questioned Jane, suggesting alternative details to her story involving Ghislaine Maxwell, New Mexico, and her age.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event