Date Unknown
Past meetings where lawyers for certain people were present and communicated with the government.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| lawyers | person | 12 | View Entity |
| government representatives | person | 0 | View Entity |
| unspecified people | person | 0 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00011719.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between Ms. Sternheim and the Judge. Ms. Sternheim argues that lawyers who attended proffer sessions with the government can be considered witnesses, but the Judge denies this, stating that such an action would have required a specific briefing that was never submitted. The core issue is the admissibility of testimony from these lawyers during the trial.
Events with shared participants
Ms. Sternheim delivers an opening statement in a legal case against Ms. Maxwell, discussing the government's approach to 'grooming' and the financial incentives for witnesses from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund.
2022-08-10 • court
A legal trial during which these instructions are given to the jury. The document outlines the rules for considering evidence presented during this trial.
Date unknown
Jeffrey Epstein signed the Non-Prosecution Agreement (“NPA”).
2007-09-24
A legal trial is in progress, during which these instructions are given to the jury.
Date unknown • courtroom
Voir dire for the trial, during which Juror Conrad's answers were given.
2025-03-01 • Court
A memorandum was written or filed, which is the subject of analysis in this document.
2011-07-08
Hearing on the Government's nolle prosequi motion.
2019-08-27 • Southern District of New York Court
The underlying legal trial during which Conrad served as a juror.
Date unknown
The jury selection process where Juror Conrad gave answers under oath.
2025-11-03
The lawyers submitted a memorandum regarding a new trial motion.
2011-07-08
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event