Event Details
January 01, 2003
Description
Decision in Stogner v. California
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supreme Court | location | 22 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00021118.jpg
This document is a page from a legal brief (Case 22-1426) filed on February 28, 2023. It argues against the District Court's reliance on a floor statement by Senator Leahy regarding the PROTECT Act and the constitutionality of retroactive prosecution. The text contends that the court improperly applied the standards of 'Stogner v. California' (2003) to analyze Leahy's remarks, noting that Stogner was decided after the PROTECT Act was passed.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Supreme Court case Blackledge v. Perry, addressing prosecutorial vindictiveness.
1974-01-01 • U.S.
Supreme Court case Williams v. Pennsylvania, addressing judicial bias.
2016-01-01 • Pennsylvania
The Supreme Court rejects Section 3 of DOMA in the case United States v. Windsor.
0013-08-28 • United States
Supreme Court holds that muni bonds are still tax-free in Kentucky v. Davis.
0008-05-30
Supreme Court affirms that trust investment advisory fees are subject to a 2% floor (Knight case).
0008-01-28
Issuance of a Supreme Court opinion (likely NYT v Sullivan) regarding the Sedition Act.
1964-01-01 • Supreme Court
Supreme Court's Windsor decision regarding DOMA
2013-06-01 • Washington D.C.
Supreme Court decision in Flemming v. Nestor
1960-01-01 • USA
Roe v. Wade
Date unknown • US Supreme Court
Bush v. Gore
2000-01-01 • US Supreme Court
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event