Event Details

Future/Hypothetical

Description

Potential firing of the Attorney General or Rod Rosenstein.

Participants (3)

Name Type Mentions
The President person 93 View Entity
Rosenstein person 21 View Entity
Attorney General person 138 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030252.jpg

Report / Internal Memo / Book Excerpt (House Oversight Document)
View

This document appears to be a page from a report, book, or detailed memo obtained by the House Oversight Committee (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030252). It analyzes the legal strategies and tensions between the Trump White House and the Mueller Special Counsel investigation. Key topics include the President's potential to unilaterally fire Rod Rosenstein or the Attorney General, the strategic use of presidential pardons (specifically regarding Michael Flynn), and the Special Counsel's view that using pardons to protect oneself constitutes obstruction of justice.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

Supreme Court case: Myers v. United States. The President refused to enforce a limitation on his removal power, and the Supreme Court vindicated the President's interpretation.

1926-01-01 • United States

View

Supreme Court case: United States v. Lovett. The President enforced a statute to withhold compensation from employees, despite believing it was unconstitutional, while the Justice Department argued against its constitutionality.

1946-01-01 • United States

View

Supreme Court case: Morrison v. Olson. The Attorney General enforced the independent counsel statute, which the President viewed as unconstitutional, while the Justice Department attacked its constitutionality in court.

1988-01-01 • United States

View

Supreme Court case INS v. Chadha, where the executive branch enforced a legislative veto it opposed in order to allow for judicial review.

1983-01-01 • United States

View

Supreme Court case Morrison v. Olson, where the Attorney General enforced the independent counsel statute while the Justice Department simultaneously attacked its constitutionality in court.

1988-01-01 • United States

View

The Ninth Circuit court ruled in Lear Siegler, Inc. v. Lehman (842 F.2d 1102), rejecting the President's constitutional arguments and finding Lear Siegler was a prevailing party entitled to attorneys' fees.

1988-01-01 • Ninth Circuit

View

The President refused to comply with provisions of the Competition in Contracting Act, viewing them as unconstitutional.

Date unknown

View

The Ninth Circuit issues its initial ruling in Lear Siegler, Inc. v. Lehman, 842 F.2d 1102, rejecting the President's constitutionality arguments and finding Lear Siegler was a prevailing party entitled to attorneys' fees.

1988-01-01 • Ninth Circuit

View

The memorandum was declassified by order of the President.

2018-02-02 • United States

View

Issuance of Executive Order 13496, mentioned as a related administrative action mandating federal contractors post NLRA rights notices.

2009-02-04 • United States

View

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
White House
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
3
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-19 22:33

Additional Data

Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030252.jpg
Date String
Future/Hypothetical

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event