February 07, 2005
Decision in United States v. Bin Laden
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bin Laden | person | 20 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00009160.jpg
This document is page 41 of a legal brief filed on February 24, 2022, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The text argues against granting an evidentiary hearing regarding juror misconduct allegations, citing precedents from cases involving El Chapo (Guzman Loera), Bin Laden, and Martha Stewart. The argument asserts that unsworn newspaper reports or anonymous claims are insufficient evidence to warrant a juror inquiry.
Events with shared participants
Ruling in United States v. Bin Laden, where a court held that a single sentence in a New York Times article was insufficient to justify a hearing on juror misconduct.
2005-02-07 • S.D.N.Y.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event