January 01, 2010
A subsequent re-evaluation of respondent Catherine M. Conrad was conducted.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Catherine M. Conrad | person | 53 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00009445.jpg
This legal document is a court order from the First Judicial Department regarding attorney Catherine M. Conrad. The court grants the Departmental Disciplinary Committee's motion to suspend Conrad indefinitely due to a medical disability related to her admitted alcohol dependency. The court denies Conrad's cross-motion for immediate reinstatement, stating she has not yet met the burden of proving her fitness to resume the practice of law.
Events with shared participants
Court proceedings in US v. Daugerdas involving the examination of witnesses Trzaskoma and Conrad
2012-02-15 • Southern District (implied NY)
Attorney Registration Information for Catherine M. Conrad was recorded.
2011-06-24
Legal case 'In the Matter of Catherine M. Conrad, 48 A.D.3d 187' (1st Dep't).
2007-12-18
Legal case 'In the Matter of Catherine M. Conrad, 80 A.D.3d 187' (1st Dep't).
2010-12-09
A past voir dire process is discussed, where the plan was for Judge Pauley to question potential juror Catherine M. Conrad to determine if she was the same person from a court opinion.
Date unknown
Catherine M. Conrad was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York.
2000-01-26 • State of New York
The Court suspended respondent Catherine M. Conrad from the practice of law for failure to respond to requests from the Departmental Disciplinary Committee.
2007-12-18 • First Judicial Department
The Committee obtained a psychiatric evaluation of respondent Catherine M. Conrad.
2009-01-01
Catherine M. Conrad is called as a witness, granted use immunity after asserting her Fifth Amendment privilege, and questioned by Mr. Gair. She admits her prior testimony contained lies and omissions.
2012-02-15 • Courtroom
Catherine M. Conrad gave testimony under oath during voir dire for the trial of United States v. Daugerdas. She later admits this testimony contained omissions and lies.
2011-03-01 • Courtroom
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event