March 01, 2011
Catherine M. Conrad gave testimony under oath during voir dire for the trial of United States v. Daugerdas. She later admits this testimony contained omissions and lies.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Catherine M. Conrad | person | 53 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00009239.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, for the case of United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas. It captures the direct examination of witness Catherine M. Conrad, who initially pleads the Fifth Amendment regarding her prior testimony from March 2011. After being granted use immunity by the court, Conrad admits under questioning that her previous testimony as a prospective juror contained both omissions and lies.
Events with shared participants
Court proceedings in US v. Daugerdas involving the examination of witnesses Trzaskoma and Conrad
2012-02-15 • Southern District (implied NY)
Attorney Registration Information for Catherine M. Conrad was recorded.
2011-06-24
Legal case 'In the Matter of Catherine M. Conrad, 48 A.D.3d 187' (1st Dep't).
2007-12-18
Legal case 'In the Matter of Catherine M. Conrad, 80 A.D.3d 187' (1st Dep't).
2010-12-09
A past voir dire process is discussed, where the plan was for Judge Pauley to question potential juror Catherine M. Conrad to determine if she was the same person from a court opinion.
Date unknown
Catherine M. Conrad was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York.
2000-01-26 • State of New York
The Court suspended respondent Catherine M. Conrad from the practice of law for failure to respond to requests from the Departmental Disciplinary Committee.
2007-12-18 • First Judicial Department
The Committee obtained a psychiatric evaluation of respondent Catherine M. Conrad.
2009-01-01
A subsequent re-evaluation of respondent Catherine M. Conrad was conducted.
2010-01-01
Catherine M. Conrad is called as a witness, granted use immunity after asserting her Fifth Amendment privilege, and questioned by Mr. Gair. She admits her prior testimony contained lies and omissions.
2012-02-15 • Courtroom
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event