Event Details
February 04, 2018
Description
In United States v. Patrick Ho, the defendant was ordered detained based on risk of flight.
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick Ho | person | 22 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00020091.jpg
This page from a legal document analyzes several precedent cases to argue for or against the detention of a defendant pending trial. It distinguishes the current case from others like *Khashoggi* and *Bodmer* where defendants were released, and draws parallels to cases like *Boustani*, *Patrick Ho*, and *Epstein* where defendants were detained. The analysis focuses on factors such as flight risk, financial resources, ties to foreign countries, and the existence of extradition treaties.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
United States v. Patrick Ho, where the defendant was ordered detained based on risk of flight, strength of evidence, and ties to foreign jurisdictions.
2018-02-04 • S.D.N.Y.
United States v. Patrick Ho, 17 Cr. 779 (KBF), Dkt. 49 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 4, 2018)
2018-02-04 • Southern District of New York
United States v. Patrick Ho ruling
2018-02-04 • S.D.N.Y.
United States v. Patrick Ho decision
2018-02-04 • S.D.N.Y.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event