Event Details
February 04, 2018
Description
United States v. Patrick Ho decision
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick Ho | person | 22 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00002192(1).jpg
This document is page 31 of a court filing (Document 100) from December 18, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text presents a legal argument supporting the detention of the defendant by distinguishing her case from previous instances where bail was granted (Khashoggi, Bodmer) and comparing her to cases where detention was upheld due to flight risk and foreign ties (Boustani, Patrick Ho). Notably, it cites a 2001 case, 'United States v. Epstein,' as precedent for denying bail based on dual citizenship and lack of extradition treaties; however, this 2001 citation likely refers to a different defendant named Epstein (in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania) rather than Jeffrey Epstein.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
In United States v. Patrick Ho, the defendant was ordered detained based on risk of flight.
2018-02-04 • S.D.N.Y.
United States v. Patrick Ho, where the defendant was ordered detained based on risk of flight, strength of evidence, and ties to foreign jurisdictions.
2018-02-04 • S.D.N.Y.
United States v. Patrick Ho, 17 Cr. 779 (KBF), Dkt. 49 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 4, 2018)
2018-02-04 • Southern District of New York
United States v. Patrick Ho ruling
2018-02-04 • S.D.N.Y.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event