Event Details
May 12, 2011
Description
Berke recalls speaking with Susan Brune about Catherine Conrad in the witness room. The date is noted as likely the day after the note was read, but with some uncertainty.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Susan Brune | person | 62 | View Entity |
| Berke | person | 33 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00010108.jpg
This document is a court transcript of a direct examination of an individual named Berke. Berke testifies about events on May 11, 2011, when the court read a note from Juror Catherine Conrad regarding jury instructions. Berke also discusses his professional relationship with another lawyer, Susan Brune, who represented David Parse in the same case, and recalls speaking with her about the juror.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Edelstein and Susan Brune decided to omit information about a juror note and a suspended lawyer from a legal brief they were preparing.
Date unknown
Susan Brune and Laurie Edelstein testified.
Date unknown • Court
Cross-examination of a witness named Berke.
2022-03-22
A past conversation recalled by Berke where it was noted that Juror No. 1 had been a plaintiff in a personal injury case.
Date unknown
A discussion about whether to bring information about a juror to the Court's attention, resulting in a decision not to do so and not to investigate further.
Date unknown • the park
Cross-examination of a witness named Berke regarding an assessment of possible juror misconduct.
2022-03-24 • Southern District Court (implied)
Examination of Ms. Edelstein by Mr. Okula regarding the firm's knowledge of facts related to a government note and a Catherine Conrad letter, and the ethical implications of a motion decision. The witness is excused at the end of the excerpt.
Date unknown • Southern District
Attorney Mr. Okula cross-examines witness Berke during a legal proceeding.
Date unknown • Courtroom (implied)
Brune & Richard lawyers reviewed alternatives after an investigation and decided to do nothing regarding an issue with a juror.
0012-05-01
A past conversation is discussed where the witness (Berke) and another person noted their belief that Juror 1 had been a plaintiff in a personal injury case.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event