Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
A past conversation recalled by Berke where it was noted that Juror No. 1 had been a plaintiff in a personal injury case.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Berke | person | 33 | View Entity |
| unnamed female colleague ('she') | person | 0 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009433.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a cross-examination of a witness named Berke, filed on February 24, 2022. The questioning focuses on what Berke knew about a potential connection between 'Juror No. 1' and a 'suspended New York attorney.' Berke denies being told specific details but recalls a conversation where it was noted that the juror had previously been a plaintiff in a personal injury case.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Cross-examination of a witness named Berke.
2022-03-22
Cross-examination of a witness named Berke regarding an assessment of possible juror misconduct.
2022-03-24 • Southern District Court (implied)
Attorney Mr. Okula cross-examines witness Berke during a legal proceeding.
Date unknown • Courtroom (implied)
A past conversation is discussed where the witness (Berke) and another person noted their belief that Juror 1 had been a plaintiff in a personal injury case.
Date unknown
Redirect examination of witness Berke by attorney Mr. Shechtman, followed by the witness being excused.
2022-03-22 • Courtroom (implied)
Cross-examination of witness Berke by attorney Mr. Okula during a trial.
2022-02-24 • Courtroom (implied)
A witness named Berke is being cross-examined about their duties as an attorney and officer of the court.
Date unknown • Courtroom or deposition setting
The Court read a note from Juror No. 1, Catherine Conrad, during an afternoon session.
2011-05-11 • Court
Berke recalls speaking with Susan Brune about Catherine Conrad in the witness room. The date is noted as likely the day after the note was read, but with some uncertainty.
2011-05-12 • witness room
A witness named Berke is being cross-examined about their knowledge of a juror's background.
Date unknown • Courtroom
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event