Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
Conrad served as a juror in a case involving Mr. Okula, where she claims she "fought the good fight."
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conrad | person | 113 | View Entity |
| Jury | person | 126 | View Entity |
| MR. OKULA | person | 182 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009944.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Conrad. The questioning focuses on her credibility, exploring her past actions as a juror for a Mr. Okula, her understanding of financial matters from an expert named Dr. DeRosa, and her failure to disclose a prior disciplinary suspension from the Bar Association during jury selection. The transcript also reveals personal details, such as her husband being a convicted felon, which are used to challenge her character and motivations.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.
2022-08-10
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
The jury convicted the defendant on five counts.
Date unknown
Direct examination of witness 'Kate' in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Projected start of opening statements.
2021-11-29 • SDNY
Court proceedings in US v. Daugerdas involving the examination of witnesses Trzaskoma and Conrad
2012-02-15 • Southern District (implied NY)
An ongoing trial is mentioned, for which exhibits are being prepared and presented.
Date unknown • Courtroom (implied)
The jury's first task is to choose a foreperson.
Date unknown • Jury Room
The court takes a 45-minute luncheon recess. Proceedings are scheduled to resume with opening statements and conclude for the day at 5 p.m.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Direct examination of juror/witness Conrad regarding her conduct during voir dire.
2012-02-15 • Courtroom
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event