Event Details

October 06, 2009

Description

Deposition of Larry Eugene Morrison

Participants (2)

Name Type Mentions
attorneys person 70 View Entity
Larry Eugene Morrison person 4 View Entity

Source Documents (2)

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013341.jpg

Legal Filing / Affidavit (Page 23) • 1.63 MB
View

This legal filing (page 23) details allegations regarding conflict of interest involving former AUSA Reinhart, who switched from prosecuting to defending Epstein's associates. It cites various depositions (house manager, housekeeper, pilot, and Alfredo Rodriguez) to establish Ghislaine Maxwell's deep involvement in managing Epstein's affairs and her active participation in the sexual abuse and documentation of underage girls.

008.pdf

Legal Motions and Deposition Transcripts • 1.14 MB
View

This document contains a Motion for Protective Order filed by Igor Zinoview and Jeffrey Epstein to limit the scope of depositions in a civil case. Zinoview asserts via affidavit that he only began working for Epstein in November 2005, after the alleged events, and thus has no relevant knowledge. The filing also includes excerpts from the depositions of Epstein's pilots, Larry Visoski and Larry Eugene Morrison, where they are questioned about their personal beliefs regarding the sexual abuse allegations and whether they would trust Epstein with their own daughters. Flight logs and passenger manifests are referenced in the deposition indexes ('PLAINTIFF'S EX. 1 FLIGHT LOG BOOK' and 'JEGE, Inc., Passenger Manifest') but the actual log content is not present in these specific pages.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

A remarkable hearing where victims provided testimony and input, and attorneys offered legal advocacy and submissions.

Date unknown

View

A meeting with attorneys took place. AK states she never met with them again and no investigation was opened as a result.

2016-02-29 • SDNY

View

The overall legal proceeding during which information about Ms. Conrad was or was not available.

Date unknown

View

The document is a transcript of jury instructions from a trial, specifically Instruction No. 43 regarding inferences.

Date unknown • courthouse

View

Attorneys allege Epstein is not receiving medication; MCC staff review records.

2019-07-30 • MCC New York

View

A legal trial during which the names of people were heard who did not appear to testify.

Date unknown

View

Discussion of the defendant's motion for attorney-conducted voir dire (jury selection) due to pretrial publicity and the sensitive nature of the case.

Date unknown

View

A criminal trial where the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, exercised her right not to testify. The document contains instructions for the jury regarding this fact and the absence of other potential witnesses.

Date unknown

View

A proposed charging conference to be held on a Friday.

Date unknown • Courtroom (unspecified)

View

A meeting between AK and attorneys to discuss a proposal for SDNY to investigate conduct previously handled in Florida.

Date unknown

View

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
Unknown
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
2
Source Documents
2
Extracted
2025-11-19 22:05

Additional Data

Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013341.jpg
Date String
2009-10-06

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event