April 18, 2019
Boies Schiller second subpoena response
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boies Schiller | person | 6 | View Entity |
| SDNY | organization | 1258 | View Entity |
| DOJ | person | 2 | View Entity |
| USAO SDNY | person | 0 | View Entity |
EFTA00010245.pdf
This document is an email chain between an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the SDNY and support staff regarding the ingestion of digital evidence into the 'Relativity' database for the case 'US v Epstein (USAO # 2018R01618)'. The emails discuss processing two specific subpoena responses from the law firm Boies Schiller (BSF), dated March 4, 2019, and April 18, 2019. The correspondence also details technical exclusions, specifically requesting that raw DVD data files (VIDEO_TS) for interviews with individuals identified as H.R., J.H., S., A.D., and A.T. be excluded from the upload.
EFTA00020769.pdf
This document is an email chain from March and April 2019 between the Southern District of New York (SDNY) Assistant U.S. Attorney's office and technical support staff regarding the 'US v. Epstein' case (USAO # 2018R01618). The correspondence details the process of loading subpoena returns from the law firm Boies Schiller (referred to as BSF) into the Relativity e-discovery database. The emails specifically reference file paths containing video interviews with individuals identified only by initials (H.R., J.H., S.V., A.D., A.T.) and discuss the technical handling of DVD file structures.
EFTA00020692.pdf
This document is an email chain from March and April 2019 between the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) and IT/litigation support staff regarding the 'US v. Epstein' case (2018R01618). The correspondence details the technical process of uploading subpoena returns from the law firm Boies Schiller (referred to as BSF) into the Relativity review platform. The text reveals specific file paths indicating the government was in possession of video interviews with individuals identified by initials (H.R., J.H., S.V., A.D., A.T.).
Events with shared participants
A search warrant was authorized by the SDNY US Attorney's office for the office of Donald Trump's private lawyer. The warrant was justified with a 'crime-fraud exception'.
2018-04-09 • New York
Review of JE (Jeffrey Epstein) iPhone evidence
2020-11-07 • Unknown
OGIS holds first training session for FOIA Public Liaisons
2010-03-23 • Unknown
United States v. McVeigh legal proceedings and appeals regarding victims' rights to attend trial
1996-01-01 • 10th Circuit Court
The Washington Examiner reported that Attorney General Barr announced a DOJ inspector general investigation into Epstein's death.
2019-08-10
The DOJ and the FBI issued a memorandum regarding their review of investigative holdings on Epstein.
2025-07-06
The DOJ and FBI conducted an exhaustive review of investigative holdings relating to Jeffrey Epstein, including digital and physical searches, uncovering over 300 gigabytes of data.
Date unknown
Production of discovery materials (Amazon records) by the DOJ to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team.
2021-11-11 • New York, NY
A lawsuit between Giuffre and Maxwell, which involved a bitter, hard-fought, and wide-ranging discovery process spanning over a year.
Date unknown
The parties entered a stipulated Protective Order. Boies Schiller proposed adding a 'law enforcement' exception, which Maxwell rejected.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event