Event Details

Date Unknown

Description

The document discusses the concurring opinions from the legal case McDonough regarding juror honesty and bias.

Participants (5)

Name Type Mentions
Justice Stevens person 4 View Entity
Justice O'Connor person 11 View Entity
Justice Black person 15 View Entity
Justice Marshall person 9 View Entity
Justice Brennan person 23 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00009034.jpg

Unknown type • 770 KB
View

This document is a page from a legal filing dated February 24, 2022, which analyzes legal precedent concerning juror bias, specifically from the case of McDonough. It presents quotes from concurring opinions by Justice Blackmun and Justice Brennan, arguing that an intentionally false answer from a juror is not a necessary condition for a new trial and that juror bias can be inferred from circumstances. The document highlights the judicial reasoning that a trial court retains the option to hold a post-trial hearing to determine bias, regardless of a juror's honesty during voir dire.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

Meeting to discuss the constitutionality of the death penalty

Date unknown • Washington D.C. (implied)

View

The legal case of Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, was decided.

1938-01-01 • U.S. Supreme Court

View

Event Metadata

Type
Legal Case Discussion
Location
Unknown
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
5
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 15:29

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00009034.jpg
Date String
N/A

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event