Date Unknown
The document discusses the concurring opinions from the legal case McDonough regarding juror honesty and bias.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Justice Stevens | person | 4 | View Entity |
| Justice O'Connor | person | 11 | View Entity |
| Justice Black | person | 15 | View Entity |
| Justice Marshall | person | 9 | View Entity |
| Justice Brennan | person | 23 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00009034.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing dated February 24, 2022, which analyzes legal precedent concerning juror bias, specifically from the case of McDonough. It presents quotes from concurring opinions by Justice Blackmun and Justice Brennan, arguing that an intentionally false answer from a juror is not a necessary condition for a new trial and that juror bias can be inferred from circumstances. The document highlights the judicial reasoning that a trial court retains the option to hold a post-trial hearing to determine bias, regardless of a juror's honesty during voir dire.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event