February 15, 2012
Direct examination of witness Conrad regarding her residency and truthfulness during jury selection.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conrad | person | 113 | View Entity |
| Unnamed Questioner | person | 53 | View Entity |
| MR. OKULA | person | 182 | View Entity |
| The Court | organization | 2003 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00009252.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, for the case of United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al. A witness, Ms. Conrad, is being questioned about providing conflicting residency information (Bronx vs. Bronxville) during jury selection. The questioning suggests she may have misrepresented her address to appear more 'marketable' as a juror and to potentially conceal a tumultuous home life.
Events with shared participants
The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.
2022-08-10
A witness is questioned about their past interactions with detectives.
2017-07-26
A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.
2022-08-10 • courthouse
The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.
Date unknown
The Government gave on-the-record assurances to the Court regarding investigative files.
2020-07-14
A discussion between attorneys and the court regarding how to respond to a jury note.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Court proceeding regarding witness strategy in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Jury Deliberation/Instruction
Date unknown • Courtroom
Direct examination of witness 'Kate' in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Direct examination of witness Rodgers regarding entries in a flight log.
2022-08-10
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event