January 01, 2004
Citation to Leocal v. Ashcroft, which also concerned a statute with language invoking an elements-based approach.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leocal | person | 12 | View Entity |
| Ashcroft | person | 27 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00021707.jpg
This legal document presents an argument against Maxwell's interpretation of Section 3283 of the U.S. Code. The author refutes Maxwell's claim that the phrase "offense involving" requires a narrow, elements-based analysis, citing precedents like *Weingarten* and *Nijhawan* to support a broader, circumstance-specific approach. The document distinguishes the cases cited by Maxwell by arguing they involved different statutory language, specifically definitions of a "crime of violence," which are not present here.
Events with shared participants
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event