Event Details
December 01, 2007
Description
Appellate Division finding regarding Conrad's conduct.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Catherine Conrad | person | 154 | View Entity |
| Appellate Division | organization | 36 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009936.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, in the case of USA v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al. It features the direct examination of a witness, Catherine Conrad, by attorney Mr. Gair. The questioning focuses on impeaching Conrad's credibility by highlighting her history of alcoholism, pancreatitis, and a suspension from the practice of law by the Appellate Division for 'shocking disregard for the judicial system' and mental/physical disability. The document bears a DOJ-OGR Bates stamp, often associated with document releases related to high-profile inquiries, though the specific link to Epstein in this fragment appears to be the document batch source rather than direct content.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Letter from Catherine Conrad to Stanley J. Oklua [sic], Esq.
2011-05-25
Certificate of Disposition for the case 'People v. Catherine Conrad'.
1998-08-21 • Criminal Court of the City of New York, County of Bronx
Examination of Ms. Edelstein by Mr. Okula regarding the firm's knowledge of facts related to a government note and a Catherine Conrad letter, and the ethical implications of a motion decision. The witness is excused at the end of the excerpt.
Date unknown • Southern District
Date mentioned in a question regarding when information was gathered on Catherine Conrad at Theresa Trzaskoma's request.
0012-05-01
Certificate of Disposition issued for the case 'People v. Catherine Conrad' from the Criminal Court of the City of New York, County of Bronx.
1998-08-21 • Criminal Court of the City of New York, County of Bronx
A letter was sent from Catherine Conrad to Stanley J. Oklua, Esq.
2011-05-25
A pending disciplinary proceeding concerning Ms. Conrad's medical suspension held before the disciplinary committee of the First Judicial Department.
Date unknown • First Judicial Department
Planned testimony of Ms. Conrad where she intends to assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.
2012-02-15 • courtroom
A jury had discussions and deliberations regarding David Parse, and struggled with the definitions of 'wilfully' and 'knowingly' for different counts, including conspiracy and tax evasion.
Date unknown
The Court read a note from Juror No. 1, Catherine Conrad, during an afternoon session.
2011-05-11 • Court
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event