January 01, 1945
Bridges submitted a naturalization application, denying membership in the Communist Party.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bridges | person | 23 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00021108.jpg
This legal document analyzes the application of the Wartime Suspension of Limitations Act (WSLA) by referencing the 1953 Supreme Court case *Bridges v. U.S.* It details how Bridges was charged for a false statement regarding Communist Party membership in his 1945 naturalization application and how the Supreme Court interpreted the WSLA's scope. The document criticizes a District Court for mischaracterizing the *Bridges* opinion concerning the WSLA's legislative history and the nature of fraud.
Events with shared participants
The Court applied a categorical approach to the Wartime Suspension of Limitations Act (WSLA) in *Bridges v. U.S.*
1953-01-01
The Government charged Bridges with willfully making a false statement.
Date unknown
The case of Bridges v. United States, 346 U.S. 209, which laid out the "essential ingredient test" and evaluated the language "offense involving fraud".
1953-01-01
The Supreme Court's decision in Bridges v. United States, 346 U.S. 209 (1953), which concerned the Wartime Suspension of Limitations Act and established an 'essential ingredients' test.
1953-01-01
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event