Event Details
Unknown
Description
Direct examination testimony of witness Brune.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brune | person | 216 | View Entity |
| Unidentified Examiner | person | 6 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009310.jpg
This document is page 249 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on February 24, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Brune, an attorney, regarding the marketing and claims made on the website of their law firm, Brune & Richard. The questioning focuses on Brune's self-description regarding 'sound strategic choices,' 'meticulous preparation,' and 'forceful advocacy.'
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Ms. Brune is giving testimony under direct examination.
Date unknown • Courtroom
A direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding the legal team and paralegals involved in the 'Parma matter'.
Date unknown • Unspecified
Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding the jury selection process (voir dire).
Date unknown
A past voir dire process is discussed, where the plan was for Judge Pauley to question potential juror Catherine M. Conrad to determine if she was the same person from a court opinion.
Date unknown
Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding their legal experience and a specific trial.
Date unknown • Courtroom (implied)
The witness, Brune, confirms having conducted many Grand Jury investigations in a past role as an assistant.
Date unknown
Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding a colleague's involvement in a trial and his own legal experience.
Date unknown • Court proceeding
The witness, Brune, was out of the country.
0015-05-01 • out of the country
The witness, Brune, first learned about the voir dire.
0018-07-01
Brune confirms he conducted many Grand Jury investigations during his time as an assistant.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event