Event Details
February 24, 2022
Description
Cross-examination of Mr. Schoeman regarding his knowledge of information connecting Juror No. 1, Catherine Conrad, to a suspended attorney.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schoeman | person | 24 | View Entity |
| Unnamed questioner (attorney) | person | 0 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009425.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 24, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a former Assistant U.S. Attorney named Schoeman. The questioning centers on what Schoeman knew about allegations that Juror No. 1, Catherine Conrad, was a suspended attorney, referencing a potential Westlaw report and an internal firm email he claims not to have seen. Schoeman maintains he was unaware of the specific information and only took action by asking about the voir dire.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Cross-examination of witness Rocchio regarding testimony on childhood abuse reporting rates, specifically discussing the 'Alaggia study, 2010'.
2025-01-15 • Court in the Southern District
A witness named Loftus is being questioned about their professional qualifications and the basis for their expert opinions on memory.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom (implied)
The witness, Schoeman, first met Theresa Trzaskoma.
Date unknown
Cross-examination of witness Schoeman by attorney Mr. Okula regarding the timing of a conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma.
Date unknown • Courtroom
Cross-examination of witness Mr. McHugh regarding Government Exhibits 502 (checks) and 506 (a signature card). The questioning links an account in Ghislaine Maxwell's name to a signature card for a different account signed by Harry Beller.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom (implied)
Direct examination of Conrad regarding his deliberate decision to lie during jury selection.
2012-02-15 • Courtroom
Cross-examination of witness A. Farmer regarding their visit to the property later known as Zorro Ranch.
2022-08-10 • Court or deposition setting
Cross-examination of witness Schoeman regarding an analysis he performed about the identity of Juror No. 1.
2012-02-24 • Courtroom (implied)
A conversation between Schoeman and Ms. Trzaskoma where Trzaskoma mentioned a possible connection between Juror No. 1 and a suspended attorney because they had the same name.
Date unknown
Cross-examination of Schoeman regarding an investigation into a juror.
2012-02-24
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event