This document is a court transcript from February 24, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a former Assistant U.S. Attorney named Schoeman. The questioning centers on what Schoeman knew about allegations that Juror No. 1, Catherine Conrad, was a suspended attorney, referencing a potential Westlaw report and an internal firm email he claims not to have seen. Schoeman maintains he was unaware of the specific information and only took action by asking about the voir dire.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Schoeman | Witness / Former Assistant U.S. Attorney |
The individual being cross-examined, addressed as Mr. Schoeman.
|
| Catherine Conrad | Juror No. 1 |
Identified as Juror No. 1, who is the subject of the questioning.
|
| Theresa Trzaskoma |
Mentioned as a potential source of information for Mr. Schoeman.
|
|
| Juror No. 1 | Juror |
A juror in a case, identified as Catherine Conrad, who is allegedly a suspended attorney.
|
| Unnamed suspended attorney | Suspended Attorney |
An individual who Juror No. 1 is suspected of being.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Westlaw | Company |
Mentioned as the source of a report containing information about Juror No. 1.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding.
|
| U.S. Attorney's Office | Government agency |
Implied by Mr. Schoeman's former role as an "Assistant U.S. Attorney".
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied location of the court proceeding, as indicated by the court reporting agency's name.
|
"Jesus, I think Juror No. 1 is the suspended attorney"Source
"I'll stipulate with you."Source
"I don't know what I would have done. I guess I can only tell you what I did do, which was ask about the voir dire."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,436 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document