Unknown (During Trial)
Testimony presented regarding a witness's sexual abuse.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jury | person | 126 | View Entity |
| witness | person | 107 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00021867.jpg
This page is from a legal opinion (likely the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, given the citations) affirming a District Court's denial of Ghislaine Maxwell's motion. Maxwell argued that testimony regarding sexual abuse in New Mexico constituted a 'constructive amendment' or 'prejudicial variance' from the original indictment, violating the Fifth Amendment. The court reviews the denial *de novo* and rejects Maxwell's argument.
DOJ-OGR-00021814.jpg
This document is page 20 of a legal filing (likely an appellate opinion) dated September 17, 2024. It details Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal regarding a 'constructive amendment' or 'prejudicial variance' of her indictment, specifically concerning testimony about sexual abuse in New Mexico. The court affirms the District Court's denial of Maxwell's motion.
Events with shared participants
The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.
2022-08-10
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
The jury convicted the defendant on five counts.
Date unknown
Direct examination of witness 'Kate' in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Witness entered an appearance in a specific case pro hac vice.
Date unknown • Southern District of Florida
Projected start of opening statements.
2021-11-29 • SDNY
Firm partner meetings.
2009-01-01 • RRA Firm
Witness observed a young girl (est. 16-17) coming for massages.
Date unknown • Property
An ongoing trial is mentioned, for which exhibits are being prepared and presented.
Date unknown • Courtroom (implied)
The jury's first task is to choose a foreperson.
Date unknown • Jury Room
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event