Unspecified (Pre-trial)
Jury Selection Process (Questionnaire and Voir Dire)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| the parties | person | 4 | View Entity |
| Court staff | person | 8 | View Entity |
| prospective jurors | person | 14 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00010327.jpg
This document is page 4 of a court order filed on April 1, 2022, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text denies the defendant's Rule 33 motion for a new trial and outlines the background of the jury selection process, detailing how it was conducted under COVID-19 protocols using questionnaires and voir dire to screen for bias in a high-profile case. It references specific docket entries (366, 367, 404, 427, 459) and transcript dates.
Events with shared participants
Deadline for parties to submit proposed questions for the inquiry into Juror 50.
2022-03-01
Prospective jurors completed a lengthy questionnaire and underwent in-person voir dire, from which the District Court empaneled a jury.
Date unknown
A future public hearing is planned to inquire into whether Juror 50's answers were false.
Date unknown
A proposed brief hearing, outside the presence of the jury, to examine Mr. Glassman about his communications.
Date unknown • Court
Presentation of closing arguments and jury instructions.
2021-12-20 • courtroom
A hearing on potential juror misconduct involving Juror 50, mentioned in a footnote.
Date unknown • District Court
Presentation of closing argument and jury instructions scheduled for the day after the document was filed.
2021-12-20 • courtroom
The legal parties in the case conferred and agreed to offer a redacted version of Government Exhibit 296, a video, into evidence.
Date unknown
Court staff, counsel, and parties worked on a Saturday to prepare for the proceedings.
Date unknown
The judge proposed holding the charge conference on either the evening of the 16th or on Saturday the 18th.
2025-11-16 • Courtroom
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event