Event Details
July 16, 2019
Description
Court hearing regarding Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB
Participants (4)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR. ROSSMILLER | person | 72 | View Entity |
| MR. WEINGARTEN | person | 50 | View Entity |
| Mr. Weinberg | person | 73 | View Entity |
| The Court | organization | 2003 | View Entity |
Source Documents (3)
DOJ-OGR-00000397.jpg
This is page 11 of a court transcript filed on July 16, 2019. Defense attorney Mr. Weinberg argues to The Court that the discussion should concern the scope of Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), not its legality. He references a filing by Northern District of Georgia prosecutors (acting for Southern District of Florida) before Judge Marrah that supported the NPA's constitutionality and asserted Epstein fulfilled his obligations.
DOJ-OGR-00000389.jpg
This document is page 3 of a court transcript from July 16, 2019, regarding Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB (United States v. Epstein). The Judge questions prosecutor Mr. Rossmiller to ensure victims have been notified of the case. The discussion also covers Epstein's status as a Tier 3 sex offender in New York, originating from his 2008 Florida prosecution, classifying him as a high-risk individual for committing sex crimes with minors.
DOJ-OGR-00000393.jpg
This document is page 7 of a court transcript from Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB (USA v. Epstein) filed on July 16, 2019. Defense attorney Mr. Weingarten argues that discovery is needed to determine if Florida prosecutors violated the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) by steering victims to New York. Prosecutor Mr. Rossmiller responds that the conduct is within the statute of limitations and denies allegations of a conspiracy within the Department of Justice.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.
2022-08-10
A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.
2022-08-10 • courthouse
The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.
Date unknown
The Government gave on-the-record assurances to the Court regarding investigative files.
2020-07-14
A discussion between attorneys and the court regarding how to respond to a jury note.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Court proceeding regarding witness strategy in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Jury Deliberation/Instruction
Date unknown • Courtroom
Direct examination of witness 'Kate' in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Initial bail hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell, which was held 12 days after her arrest.
Date unknown
An initial bail hearing was held where the Court expressed concerns about COVID-19 and found the Defendant had no underlying health conditions.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event