DOJ-OGR-00000393.jpg
536 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
536 KB
Summary
This document is page 7 of a court transcript from Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB (USA v. Epstein) filed on July 16, 2019. Defense attorney Mr. Weingarten argues that discovery is needed to determine if Florida prosecutors violated the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) by steering victims to New York. Prosecutor Mr. Rossmiller responds that the conduct is within the statute of limitations and denies allegations of a conspiracy within the Department of Justice.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Weingarten | Defense Attorney |
Speaking on behalf of the defense, likely Reid Weingarten representing Jeffrey Epstein. Discusses discovery and the c...
|
| Mr. Rossmiller | Prosecutor |
Speaking on behalf of the government. Rebuts defense claims regarding statute of limitations and DOJ conspiracy alleg...
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding judge (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB indicates Judge Richard M. Berman).
|
| Prosecutors in Florida | Government Officials |
Referenced by Weingarten as being under criticism for past handling of the case (NPA).
|
| Alleged Victims | Victims |
Mentioned by Weingarten in the context of being 'steered' to New York.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Department of Justice |
Mentioned by Rossmiller in defense against conspiracy allegations.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency listed in footer.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2019-07-16
Court Hearing - Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB
Courtroom (likely SDNY)
Upcoming Thursday (relative to 2019-07-16)
Relationships (2)
Transcript shows them arguing opposing sides of the case.
Weingarten questions if prosecutors 'steered' victims to New York.
Key Quotes (3)
"We are interested to see whether the prosecutors in Florida, who are now under severe criticism 10 years later, steered the alleged victims to New York, whether or not they violated their responsibilities under the NPA."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000393.jpg
Quote #1
"defense counsel is saying that this conduct is ancient. What he is not saying is it is beyond the statute of limitations, because it is not."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000393.jpg
Quote #2
"Second, the allegation that this is some kind of a conspiracy within the Department of Justice is just false."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000393.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,336 characters)
Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 18 Filed 07/16/19 Page 7 of 18 7
1 count but also for a sex trafficking conspiracy count.
2 MR. WEINGARTEN: We have had good conversations with
3 the prosecutors, and we like and respect them. We are looking
4 forward to getting discovery. We are interested to see whether
5 the prosecutors in Florida, who are now under severe criticism
6 10 years later, steered the alleged victims to New York,
7 whether or not they violated their responsibilities under the
8 NPA.
9 THE COURT: Whether the federal prosecutors in Florida
10 violated their terms and conditions?
11 MR. WEINGARTEN: That will certainly be germane.
12 THE COURT: Is that the point?
13 MR. WEINGARTEN: Yes.
14 THE COURT: Got it.
15 MR. ROSSMILLER: Your Honor, if I could very briefly
16 respond to those points?
17 THE COURT: Sure.
18 MR. ROSSMILLER: I expect this will be briefed and
19 argued on Thursday. I don't intend to go into extensive
20 details about that. I just want to flag for the Court that
21 defense counsel is saying that this conduct is ancient. What
22 he is not saying is it is beyond the statute of limitations,
23 because it is not.
24 Second, the allegation that this is some kind of a
25 conspiracy within the Department of Justice is just false.
1 count but also for a sex trafficking conspiracy count.
2 MR. WEINGARTEN: We have had good conversations with
3 the prosecutors, and we like and respect them. We are looking
4 forward to getting discovery. We are interested to see whether
5 the prosecutors in Florida, who are now under severe criticism
6 10 years later, steered the alleged victims to New York,
7 whether or not they violated their responsibilities under the
8 NPA.
9 THE COURT: Whether the federal prosecutors in Florida
10 violated their terms and conditions?
11 MR. WEINGARTEN: That will certainly be germane.
12 THE COURT: Is that the point?
13 MR. WEINGARTEN: Yes.
14 THE COURT: Got it.
15 MR. ROSSMILLER: Your Honor, if I could very briefly
16 respond to those points?
17 THE COURT: Sure.
18 MR. ROSSMILLER: I expect this will be briefed and
19 argued on Thursday. I don't intend to go into extensive
20 details about that. I just want to flag for the Court that
21 defense counsel is saying that this conduct is ancient. What
22 he is not saying is it is beyond the statute of limitations,
23 because it is not.
24 Second, the allegation that this is some kind of a
25 conspiracy within the Department of Justice is just false.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00000393
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document