Date Unknown
A team within a law firm, supervised by Ms. Trzaskoma, gathered information about potential jurors for a trial.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| two lawyers from San Francisco | person | 0 | View Entity |
| Brune | person | 216 | View Entity |
| Theresa | person | 22 | View Entity |
| Ms. Trzaskoma | person | 103 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00009314.jpg
This document is a court transcript excerpt from a direct examination of a witness named Brune, filed on February 24, 2022. The testimony focuses on the roles and responsibilities for jury selection within Brune's law firm for a particular case. Brune clarifies that while they were ultimately responsible, a partner named Ms. Trzaskoma was more deeply involved in the details and supervised other lawyers in gathering information on potential jurors.
Events with shared participants
Investigation requested by Ms. Trzaskoma.
0012-05-01 • Unknown
A discussion was held regarding Catherine Conrad's potential status as a suspended lawyer, prompted by Ms. Trzaskoma. The group reviewed voir dire responses and decided against further research.
Date unknown
Ms. Brune is giving testimony under direct examination.
Date unknown • Courtroom
A direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding the legal team and paralegals involved in the 'Parma matter'.
Date unknown • Unspecified
Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding the jury selection process (voir dire).
Date unknown
A past voir dire process is discussed, where the plan was for Judge Pauley to question potential juror Catherine M. Conrad to determine if she was the same person from a court opinion.
Date unknown
Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding their legal experience and a specific trial.
Date unknown • Courtroom (implied)
The witness, Brune, confirms having conducted many Grand Jury investigations in a past role as an assistant.
Date unknown
Theresa began experiencing severe dizziness and other health problems.
2008-01-01
Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding a colleague's involvement in a trial and his own legal experience.
Date unknown • Court proceeding
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event