DOJ-OGR-00009314.jpg

401 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 401 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript excerpt from a direct examination of a witness named Brune, filed on February 24, 2022. The testimony focuses on the roles and responsibilities for jury selection within Brune's law firm for a particular case. Brune clarifies that while they were ultimately responsible, a partner named Ms. Trzaskoma was more deeply involved in the details and supervised other lawyers in gathering information on potential jurors.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Brune Witness
The person being questioned in a direct examination.
Ms. Trzaskoma Partner
A partner at Brune's firm, responsible for jury selection details and supervising others.
Theresa
Mentioned as the person ultimately responsible for the courtroom work, likely the first name of Ms. Trzaskoma.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
The court reporting agency that transcribed the document.

Timeline (2 events)

Direct examination of witness Brune regarding jury selection procedures for a specific case.
Brune Unnamed Questioner
A team within a law firm, supervised by Ms. Trzaskoma, gathered information about potential jurors for a trial.
Brune Ms. Trzaskoma Theresa two lawyers from San Francisco

Locations (1)

Location Context
Location of two lawyers who were working on the case.

Relationships (2)

Brune professional Ms. Trzaskoma
Brune states that Ms. Trzaskoma is a partner at their firm and that Brune was supervising her regarding the jury selection work.
Ms. Trzaskoma professional unnamed lawyers from San Francisco
Brune states that Ms. Trzaskoma was supervising other people within the firm, including two lawyers from San Francisco, in gathering information.

Key Quotes (2)

"I'm ultimately responsible and I was responsible at trial for jury selection, but you're correct that she was much more immersed in the details and in the effort."
Source
— Brune (Explaining the division of responsibility for jury selection between himself/herself and Ms. Trzaskoma.)
DOJ-OGR-00009314.jpg
Quote #1
"There were two lawyers from San Francisco who were doing a lot of the work, but then ultimately it was Theresa who was going to be responsible for the courtroom work."
Source
— Brune (Describing the team structure for preparing for jury selection.)
DOJ-OGR-00009314.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,274 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 1616-2 Filed 02/24/22 Page 25 of 130
A-5710
C2GFDAU1
253
Brune - direct
1 A. That's right.
2 Q. And everyone at your firm knew and understood that,
3 correct?
4 A. Sure.
5 Q. Now, Ms. Trzaskoma is a partner at your firm, correct?
6 A. Yes, she is.
7 Q. And one of her responsibilities with regard to this
8 particular case was jury selection details, correct?
9 A. That's right.
10 Q. And you entrusted her with that task, correct?
11 A. Well, yes and no. I'm ultimately responsible and I was
12 responsible at trial for jury selection, but you're correct
13 that she was much more immersed in the details and in the
14 effort.
15 Q. One of the things that your team did was to gather
16 information about potential jurors?
17 A. Yes.
18 Q. And Ms. Trzaskoma was supervising other people within the
19 firm about gathering information?
20 A. Well, it was a combination. There were two lawyers from
21 San Francisco who were doing a lot of the work, but then
22 ultimately it was Theresa who was going to be responsible for
23 the courtroom work.
24 Q. And you were supervising her in that regard, correct?
25 A. That's right.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00009314

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document